Vegetable Notes - Special Edition, April 2002
Processing Tomatoes in the
South San Joaquin Valley
|
Mixing Anti-Crusting Agents with Pre-emergence Herbicides:
Effects on Stand Establishment and Weed Control
Kurt Hembree, Farm Advisor, Fresno County
Soils that tend to seal over or crust following planting by seed and
sprinkler irrigation can lead to a significant decline in plant stand
establishment and yield. While there has been research conducted looking
at various "anti-crusting" agents, little information is known
on the influence of mixing pre-emergence herbicides with these agents.
A study was conducted in 2001 to determine the impact of combining anti-crusting
agents with Shadeout® on stand establishment and nightshade control
in processing tomatoes. A grower's field was selected in western Fresno
County that had a history of soil crusting and poor tomato stands. Plots
were established in April and measured 3 beds-wide and 600' long. Five
pre-emergence treatments were included in the study, replicated 4 times
each. The treatments were applied in a 12" band over the seeded row.
The treatments included Shadeout® alone at 2 oz/acre and Shadeout®
tank-mixed with N-Cal Platinum® (20 gpa), phosphoric plus N-phuric
acid (6 gpa each), and Thiocal (40 gpa). Untreated plots were also included
in the study. All treatments were applied with a 3-row sprayer that delivered
the spray in 50 gpa.
Processing tomatoes were planted on April 6 and the treatments were applied.
Over-head sprinkler irrigation was used to incorporate the treatments
within 3 days of treatment. No yields were determined in the study.
Tomato stand was significantly improved over all the other treatments
when N-Cal Platinum® was added to the herbicide as a tank-mix partner
(See table). There was an average of 1 tomato plant emerged every 2",
compared to 1 plant every 4" in plots not receiving any anti crusting
materials. The other anti-crusting agents did not fair much better than
the untreated. The degree of soil crusting was evaluated visually to see
how much effort was required to break through the soil surface. Soil in
the N-Cal treatment appeared flocculated, with little to no evidence of
sealing over. All other treatments varied in the degree of hardness of
the soil surface and were fairly difficult to break through. Black nightshade
control was best where Shadeout® was applied alone or with the N-Cal
treatment. The use of acid and Thiocal treatments led to reduced nightshade
control. It is known that Shadeout® activity is adversely affected
by acidity, thus explaining the poor control.
While this work is preliminary, it appears that certain anti-crusting
agents can be tank-mixed with Shadeout® following planting direct-seeded
tomatoes to improve stand while maintaining weed control. It also appears
that acid-based anti-crusting agents have an adverse effect on the activity
of Shadeout®. Further studies need to be conducted to determine the
influence of these and similar anti-crusting agents on stand establishment.
Hopefully, this will lead to the reduction in the amount of seed needed
to achieve a desired stand in soils that tend to crust.
|
|
Treatment
|
Rate/Acre
|
No. tomatoes/
10' of row
|
No. nightshade/
10' of row
|
Soil crust
rating*
|
|
1.
|
Shadeout
|
2.0 oz
|
26.7 c
|
10.7 d
|
4.5 a
|
|
2.
|
Shadeout
N-Cal Platinum
|
2.0 oz
20.0 gal
|
49.5 a
|
9.5 d
|
1.0 c
|
|
3.
|
Shadeout
N-phuric acid
Phospohoric acid
|
2.0 oz
6.0 gal
6.0 gal
|
33.5 b
|
46.5 c
|
3.5 ab
|
|
4.
|
Shadeout
Thiocal
|
2.0 oz
40.0 gal
|
24.5 c
|
60.2 b
|
3.3 b
|
|
5.
|
Untreated
|
|
26.7 c
|
107.5 a
|
4.5 a
|
|
Statistical notation at p=0.05
|
(CV):
(LSD):
|
9.95%
6.3
|
12.80%
11.8
|
17.23%
1.1
|
*Based on a scale of 0 to 5; 0 = no observed crusting and 5 = severe
crusting
View next article - Early Season Irrigation of Processing Tomatoes
Go to Table of Contents
|