|
This page was updated on
Monday March 17 2008
Download this article
1 page
192 kb
|
Vegetable Notes - Special Edition, September 2002
Processing Tomatoes
|
Whitewash Fruit Protectant: Looks good, but does it work?
Gene Miyao, Farm Advisor, Yolo/Solano/Sacramento
Counties
The principle of using a white reflective coating to protect exposed
tomato fruit has merit. On those 105°F summer days, clearly your personal
outdoor experience between wearing a dark-colored or a white polo shirt
is a simple experiment that provides compelling logic to whitewash those
tomatoes.
Simple measurements of internal fruit temperature show that whitewash
does reduce fruit temperature by several degrees. However, the question
remains. What is the maximum temperature and conditions before fruit begin
to sunburn and sunscald?
While I do not know the answer, the temperature threshold question remains
important. Temperature is not the only controlling factor, but is a primary
one. Although it may seem like a contradiction in proper management decision
making, the following holds true. The higher the temperature, the more
likely whitewash will fail to protect fruit. Why? Because whitewash is
only an aid, not a temperature insulator. Whitewash is not a canopy replacement
should vines collapse.
Fruit temperature measurements I’ve taken demonstrate that even
a dead leaflet provides more protection to a fruit than 300 lbs. per acre
of whitewash. So, establishing and maintaining a canopy is far superior
to a whitewash application for thermal protection of the fruit. With few
exceptions, in numerous replicated tests conducted in grower fields, yields
were not improved with whitewash at rates up to 300 lbs. per acre.
View next article - Irrigation: Balancing yields & solids
Go to Table of Contents
|